Equality in South Africa
Human rights are those essential rights that every human being is
supposed to have. During apartheid the majority of South Africans were
denied these rights and were treated inhuman. These rights are embedded
in the South African Constitution but since 1994 the realisations of
these rights have been minimal.
The Gini - coefficient is a
statistical tool to measure the equality in a particular country. The
South African Gini - coefficient is one of the highest in the world and
makes South Africa one of the most unequal societies in the world. In
South Africa the rich is getting richer and the poor is getting poorer.
For example, in 2009 more than 13 million people received a social grant
(Taipei Times) and in 2011 the Mail & Guardian report that about 50
percent of South African is living below the poverty line. A poverty
line is based on the minimum food needs for daily energy requirements.
South Africa’s is currently are measured at R500 per person per month
(National Treasury).
In South Africa you find that the majority
is living in conditions that are not suitable for humans; many lives in
shacks without running water, electricity or proper sanitation. The
plight of the poor in South Africa was created by a system of systematic
discrimination of blacks (used as a generic term to describe the
previously discriminated) during colonialism and apartheid.
Dr
Chinweizu argues that African states have failed to gain independence
because they are still “… still held captive within the economic and
cultural structures of the … [colonisers]”. This explains a lot with
regards to the current situation in South Africa. The majority of black
South Africans are still living the way they used to under apartheid.
Black people are still your waitresses, domestic workers, gardeners,
construction workers and farm workers something that Bantu Education
ensured. The father (Hendrik Verwoerd) of Bantu Education believed that
black people must get an education that will make them pretty much a
farm animal.
The apartheid ideology created a situation where
black people were enslaved in their own minds; they believed that they
were not more than any farm animal. This is what Dr Chinweizu is talking
about: the black people of South Africa are still held captive since
1994 within the economic and cultural structures of apartheid.
This raises the question whether all South Africans are treated equally
and like human beings. This question is not an easy one to answer,
especially if one considers the South Africa Constitution. In terms of
section 9 of the Constitution everyone has the right to be treated
equally. No one can be discriminated against race, sexual orientation,
gender, ethnicity, religion, etc. The Constitution also states that
everyone has the right to life and a right to human dignity. In addition
to this, the Constitution even went as far as embedded some
socio-economic rights such as healthcare, housing, education, food,
water and sanitation. However, the Constitution put a limitation to
these rights because it states that the state must ensure the
progressive realisation of these rights within its available resources.
This limitation on socio-economic rights has prevented the majority of
South Africans demanding for radical realisation of these rights;
radical in the sense that they demand government to give them houses and
give it to them now. From the time the new Constitution came into
effect and 2000 it seemed that citizens would have to wait for the state
to provide resources whenever they have it and whenever they had the
money for it.
But then the Grootboom case happened. Irene
Grootboom was part of a number of people who were squatting in the
Wallacedene informal settlement near Kraaifontein in the Western Cape.
When the informal settlement became overcrowded she amongst other
decided to occupy a piece of land next to the informal settlement.
However, the land owner got an eviction order and the people were
forcefully removed and their belongings were destroyed in the process.
They were stuck because they could not anymore go back to Wallacedene as
other squatters took their spaces and they decided to settle at the
local sport field.
They informed the local municipality about
their situation and demanded temporary accommodation but when they did
not received any communication from the municipality they took the
municipality to the Cape High Court. The Cape High Court ruled in favour
of Grootboom in terms of considering children. The Cape High Court took
this decision to the Constitutional Court who indicated that the state
did not fulfil its obligation in cases of people living in extreme
conditions. The ruling also encourages obliges the state to plan
properly for the realisation of socio-economic rights.
This
case created a big debate as to the state of equality in South Africa
and whether the state is doing everything its power to create an equal
society for all. Another watershed case in this regard was the Treatment
Action Campaign vs the Minister of Health and others. The TAC also took
the state to the Constitutional Courts with regards to providing HIV
positive citizens with anti-retroviral treatment. The Constitutional
Court ruled in favour of the TAC and obliges the state to provide
citizens that could not afford anti-retroviral treatment with ARVs.
Even though these cases signal a positive stance from the courts to
bring about equality and the realisation of human rights, it does not
mean that citizens are treated equally. The law recognises citizens as
equal but it does not mean that in practice equality is achieve. Let me
give you practical examples. Just look at Constantia and Khayelitsha.
More people per capita square metre is staying in Khayelitsha than in
Constantia. Constantia is a previous ‘white’ area and Khayelitsha a
previous ‘black’ area, in terms of race these areas stays the same. If
we focus on per capita income in terms of race it is clear that ‘white’
people are richer than ‘black’ people.
However, if you take a
trip to Gugulethu you might be surprised by the inequality in a black
neighbourhood. In Gugs you will find some very rich and some extremely
poor black people. The same can be said about Kraaifontein and other
places in South Africa. Even though ‘white’ people still largely enjoy
the fruits of the economy, we also notice that more and more black
people are joining them. This signals a class division among black
people. Sadly but true most of the black beneficiaries is somehow
connected to the National Executive Committee of the ANC.
In
term of education we also notice the same trends. The Sunday Times (27
May 2012) have reported that there is a primary school in Limpopo
without any class rooms. It also reported that Limpopo schools will
write exams without the necessary textbooks. This is the sad reality of
the state of education in South Africa. Furthermore, whilst ‘white’
people still largely get better education than black people, there is an
emergence of a black middleclass that is able to afford private or
really good education. In the future no one will be able to get a decent
job without a university degree, and if quality education is accessible
to the middleclass and the rich it will create a situation where the
poor majority will have to settle for inhuman work and will be trapped
in their current situation. We are noticing this already because only
last more than twenty illegal miners were killed in two separate mining
accidents. For these ‘miners’ it was their last resort to risk their
lives to put food on the table for their families.
If we
consider all of this it paints a scary picture for the poor black
majority. If this particular situation continues the poor will become
more impatient and will resort to other measures of realising their
rights such as violence. Since 2000 the number of protest marches had
increase and this is clearly a symptom of a nation that fed-up of
waiting. The poor have waited for too long. The ‘arab spring’ (the
popular uprising in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, etc.) was not predicted or
even anticipated. If I am the rich and the National Executive Committee
of the ANC this would send shivers down my spine.
29 May 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment