It is better to be a dog than a poor ‘black’ child

I can’t help but wondering about the value of a ‘black’ child in society; that is when you consider that dogs are treated better than starving ‘black’ children. It is safe to conclude that it is better to be a dog than a poor ‘black’ child.

As a dog you will at least have three meals a day. You will also have a comfortable place to sleep, be protected by high security fences, and receive regular pampered treatments by the owner.

As a dog you will not be abused by your owner because animal ‘brutality’ has become a greater sin than child abuse. Now days you cannot even swear at a dog because you will be crucified by animal activist all over the globe (like I would be after writing this).

And dare you defend yourself when a dog attacks you, you will be threatened and abuse by the owners. I know this because my brother not so long ago was attacked by a dog and when he defended himself, one of the ‘white’ (I have to emphasize the ‘race’) owners threatened him, and tried to chase him out the area.

She (the owner) said to my brother that he was not allowed in ‘their’ neighbourhood and hence, the dog had all the right to attack him (in a public road). When he stood up for himself and said that Mandela and others fought for his freedom he was cursed at and threatened more.

Minutes later after the incident on his way home he was almost ran over the other ‘white’ owner (husband). He brought a friend with and they threatened him. He was also advised never to set foot in that neighbourhood again.

This all happed because he did not allow a dog to bite him in a public road. Thus, my conclusion: it is better for a poor ‘black’ child to be a dog, than to be a poor ‘black’ human being.

P.S.: At least some celebrities stopped the dog trend and are adopting ‘black’ African children, but still I cannot help but wondering how much they value these ‘black’ children.